留言反馈
-
姓名： Tedrat 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Now thinking I want more sites built on this kind of editorial foundation, and a stop at padreorchid extended that wish into a broader hope, sites built on substance and care rather than on metrics and growth are the kind of sites I want to see more of and this one is a small example worth supporting.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： Dennistweta 时间： 1970-01-01内容： A well calibrated piece that knew its scope and stayed inside it, and a look at quaintotter maintained the same scope discipline, scope creep is one of the failure modes of long blog posts and this site has clearly invested in the editorial discipline to prevent it which shows up in tightly contained pieces.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： ArmandoHax 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at nexcove was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.回复： 暂未回复