留言反馈
-
姓名： BradleyHom 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Glad I stumbled across this post, the explanations actually make sense without needing background knowledge to follow along, and after a stop at softgrid the same was true there, no assumptions about the reader just clear writing that anyone can understand from the first line right through to the end.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： AlfonsoNapse 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Now considering the post as evidence that careful blog writing is still possible, and a look at cutandsew extended that evidence, the broader question of whether the modern web can sustain quality writing has obvious empirical answers in sites like this one and seeing them is reassuring even when they remain a minority overall today.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： AnthonyKix 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Stands apart from similar pages by actually being useful, that is high praise these days, and a look at caldoria kept that standard going, you can tell when a site is built around the reader versus around metrics and this one clearly belongs to the first category for sure based on what I read.回复： 暂未回复